Subscription Information | Your Unread Posts | Your New Posts | Member Services | CLF on |
CLF Sponsors

Fish Apple Canyon Lake




Complete sponsor list
CLF Support
Click here for
Subscription Info
$
User Name

CLF Products
CLF Logo Wear
Fishing Guides
U.S. and Canada guides


Login  •  Register

    |

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ CLF Resources ‹ Boats and Equipment
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • Gallery
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Are Lunds really that much better?

Discussion about boats, equipment, launches, etc. - NOT for listing items for sale.

Moderator: ja-knee-sea

Post a reply
22 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby The Little King » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:39 am

the gas tank on my lund was already set up with a second hookup fo rhte kicker, on a tracker you have to drill a hole in the gas tank and then get the fittings....

In mounting rod holders, my lund already had 1/2" plywood backer - on a tracker you have to add backer plates to everything.

When adding new eletrioncs the fuse pannel on my lund had 3 extra slots so adding stuff was easy. On the tracker you have to combine stuff or add a new panel.
User avatar
The Little King
2010 CLF Fantasy Football Champion
 
Posts: 6414
Images: 367
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: Lindenhurst
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Advertisement

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby big saw » Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:02 pm

Agreed, regarding Trackers. They have made a lot of improvements over the years but thy have a long way to go.
Bravery and Fear are one in the same. It is how you react to them that determines which you have.
big saw
2-year CLF Subscriber
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:57 pm
Top

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby JeffC » Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:30 pm

I have a 09' lund and I think knowing that my Rivets have a lifetime warranty, I currently know that my boat is really tight. Also I remember reading that the floor also holds that same warranty. Not that I would want them to have my boat for a month to fix the floor, but knowing that if it ever gets soft there are no worries.
JeffC
CLF Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 2:12 pm
Top

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby WalleyedMike » Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:35 pm

Nitebite wrote:Better ride, drier ride, better boat control, easier trailoring and very roomy.

Now, now.... let's not throw stones.

Alumacraft makes an excellent boat as well. Thicker hull, standard hydraulic steering, larger livewells, more rod storage, equally good ride, equally dry ride, equally good boat control, easy trailering, and very roomy, excellant warranty.
As always, I am............. walleyed
WalleyedMike
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 4:19 pm
Location: Dyer, IN
Top

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby basscaster » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:22 pm

Lunds are real good boat and so are Alumicrafts. They both have a thicker hull. I just broke 2 drill bits drilling into my Lund Rebel. They were small diameter bits but they were good bits. Fiberglass boats there are a few good boats-Ranger, then Triton and Basscat. You should look at resale value and buy a major brand that you can sell in a few years.
basscaster
CLF Member
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: Unincorporated Tinley-so far.
Top

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby cdubs » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:15 am

As far as getting under the bridge... Ive been out, and not made it under on my buddies Tuffy Esox Magnum. It's one of the lowest profile boats out there. Ive also been out and made it under in a Lund Pro V. I think no matter what you get there will be times you cant get under. That being said, going with a bass boat, sure, u r sitting lower and may get under the bridge but can u safely, and comfortably get to the bridge and then fish in the bigger waves?

I know i've been blown off the cooling lake when i was fishing out of my mod-v bass boat. Im much happier, and more comfortable in a deep v

There are obviously pros and cons to any hull type, just throwing that out there as something to keep in mind.

JMO, but yes, Lunds are the best rides out there, especially in bigger/wavier waters when it comes to a major brand aluminum boat, but i know a few guys with Alumacrafts and Crestliners that love em.
Just my 2 Cents
Good Luck and Happy Hunting
cdubs
3-year CLF Subscriber
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Chicago
Top

Re: Are Lunds really that much better?

Postby blufloyd » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 am

My neighbor just sold his pig of a Lund Alaskan, older than anyone on this board I think, for around $8000. I wouldn't have gave him more than $500. Beauty is in eye of the smitten. :)23
User avatar
blufloyd
10-year CLF Subscriber
 
Posts: 11185
Images: 1154
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: fishing secret spots
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Previous

Post a reply
22 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Your Unread Posts | Your New Posts | View active topics

Return to Boats and Equipment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
For advertising information and rates, contact sales@verticalscope.com
If you need assistance please send an email to the Help Desk
Copyright 1998-2012 ChicagolandFishing.com - All rights reserved.
Disclaimer
No part of ChicagolandFishing.com may be linked to, copied, printed,
or reproduced in any manner, without permission from its owner.
ChicagolandFishing.com

Outside Hub Advertising

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Advertisements by Advertisement Management