Clinton 4-4 and 4-5 - Page 2 - Chicago Illinois Fishing Forum, Information & Reports
» CLF Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-09-2014, 09:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dwight, Il
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Choupiquer View Post
Nice! Those will fry up nice and crispy.
We actually grilled them. Right beside a foil pouch of potatoes, onions, and peppers. Throw in a few beers and a bottle of white whine, great dinner
__________________
Wishin' I was fishin'
Bassin87 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-13-2014, 08:45 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
fishead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Schaumburg, Ill.
Posts: 2,109
Default

I heard the power plant was shut down most of the winter and due to be taken off line , anyone else hear anything ?
__________________
My hero's don't wear capes , they wear dog tags
fishead is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-14-2014, 05:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Zoo
Posts: 662
Default

They haven't been running much at all.Found this,

CLINTON, Ill. — Exelon's six nuclear power plants in Illinois have failed to turn a profit over the last five years, and the 27-year-old plant here is the most vulnerable for closing, a Chicago Tribune analysis has found.
Chicago-based Exelon, parent of Commonwealth Edison, and the nation's largest operator of nuclear power plants, said last month that unless market conditions improve, it will announce plant closings by the end of this year.



Shutting down nuclear generators would have been unthinkable less than a decade ago. They were once the most profitable form of generated power. But since then, cheap natural gas and a boom in wind power have driven down electricity prices, eroding nuclear power's profits.
As recently as mid-2008, competing sources of generation had very high costs relative to nuclear plants, said Travis Miller, director of utilities research at Chicago-based Morningstar. "As those fossil fuel costs came down substantially from those peaks five years ago, nuclear has lost a lot of its cost advantage when you consider the amount of capital investment it requires."
The Tribune analyzed hourly power prices that Exelon's reactors in Illinois received over six years and determined the plants haven't made enough money to cover operating and ongoing capital costs since 2008. Among the newspaper's findings:
•Exelon's plant in Clinton, the only one without a second reactor, is in the worst financial shape of the company's Illinois nuclear installations. The plant's power prices plummeted from $42 per megawatt-hour in 2008 to $22 in 2009 and have held below $29 on average each year since. Single-reactor plants like Clinton cost between $45 and $55 per megawatt-hour to operate, according to the NorthBridge Group.
•Exelon's Dresden plant is faring the best of the Illinois plants, but it still isn't profitable. In 2010 and 2011, the plant eked out $33 per megawatt-hour in sales, offset by operating costs ranging between $35 and $40 per megawatt-hour.
•Quad Cities and Byron have been hit the hardest by "negative" price conditions, meaning Exelon paid the operator of the electric grid to take its power. Because nuclear plants operate around the clock, they are continually producing power, and in 2012, the Quad Cities plant was paying the grid operator to take its power 8 percent of the time. In 2010, the Byron plant was paying out 7 percent of the time.
•Clinton's operating costs are the highest per megawatt-hour compared with its sister plants. Clinton, which supplies electricity to 1 million homes, also is vulnerable because it sells electricity to a less lucrative market than its sister plants, one that's flush with cheap electricity generated by wind turbines.
•In 2013, power prices at Clinton fell below zero 1.7 percent of the time. That means Exelon paid to have Clinton's power taken away during those hours. The average cost to Exelon when prices were negative: $53 per megawatt-hour.
Exelon has other tools to help offset losses. Its plants receive "capacity" payments, a reservation fee paid by the grid operator for power. For all of Exelon's Illinois plants other than Clinton, such payments have boosted revenue by $1 to $8 per megawatt-hour, depending on the year. Clinton's capacity payments last year were just pennies. Exelon can also hedge against a decline in power prices through fixed price contracts.


But it's not enough. Exelon officials, in a conference call last month, detailed some of the company's challenges.
"Despite our best-ever year in generation, some of our nuclear units are unprofitable at this point in the current environment, due to the low prices and the bad energy policy that we're living with," said Chief Executive Chris Crane. "A better tax policy and energy policy would be the clear answer, but if we do not see a path to sustainable profits, we will be obligated to shut units down to avoid the long-term losses."
On Friday, Exelon officials did not dispute the newspaper's findings.
Analysts also have identified Clinton as a likely candidate for closing, along with plants in Byron and Quad Cities. Exelon's other plants are in Dresden, Braidwood and LaSalle. Exelon also operates two nuclear plants in other states. They were not included in the Tribune's analysis.
__________________
Please release me, let me go.
Kodiak is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-15-2014, 03:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dwight, Il
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishead View Post
I heard the power plant was shut down most of the winter and due to be taken off line , anyone else hear anything ?
I heard the plant was shut down for 7-10 days before we went down, resulting in lower water temps
__________________
Wishin' I was fishin'
Bassin87 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-15-2014, 04:06 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Zoo
Posts: 662
Default

Its been on and off. Runs a couple days then off for 4-5. We were down last weekend and it was off and no steam at the discharge. Water temp was 70 by the discharge 49 by the intake. 4 foot waves, it was tough.
__________________
Please release me, let me go.
Kodiak is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Chicago Illinois Fishing Forum, Information & Reports forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
clinton jasons8387 Central / Southern Illinois 0 04-09-2010 12:20 PM
Clinton jasons8387 Central / Southern Illinois 2 02-16-2010 08:11 PM
Clinton 3-24 reelman2 Central / Southern Illinois 3 03-28-2005 07:27 AM
Clinton? Swashbuckler Central / Southern Illinois 1 05-25-2003 01:11 AM
Clinton 4/28 reelman2 Central / Southern Illinois 0 04-29-2003 02:47 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.